Donald Trump Orders Release of Tina Peters, Found Guilty of Election-Related Felonies, While Pushing for Treason Investigations Targeting Joe Biden, Beyoncé, Bruce Springsteen, and More

Trump Orders Release of Tina Peters, Pushes for Treason Charges Against High-Profile Figures

Washington, D.C., August 21, 2025 — In a dramatic escalation of his ongoing political battles, President Donald Trump has issued a controversial directive for the immediate release of Tina Peters, a former Colorado election clerk convicted on multiple felony counts related to a voting system data breach. Simultaneously, Trump has called for treason investigations targeting a roster of prominent figures, including pop superstar Taylor Swift, former President Barack Obama, rock legend Bruce Springsteen, global icon Beyoncé, and former President Joe Biden. The unprecedented move has sparked fierce debate, with supporters hailing it as a bold stand against perceived political persecution and critics decrying it as an abuse of power.

The Tina Peters Case: A Polarizing Pardon

Tina Peters, a former Mesa County, Colorado, election official, was sentenced to nine years in prison in 2024 for her role in a security breach involving voting equipment. Peters, a vocal proponent of election fraud claims tied to the 2020 presidential election, was convicted on charges including attempting to influence a public servant, criminal impersonation, and official misconduct. Her actions, which included allowing unauthorized access to voting systems and leaking sensitive data, were described by prosecutors as a deliberate attempt to undermine election integrity. Peters and her supporters, however, framed her actions as a courageous effort to expose alleged widespread voter fraud, a narrative that has resonated with Trump’s base.

On August 21, 2025, Trump took to his Truth Social platform to demand Peters’ immediate release, calling her a “brave and innocent Patriot” and an “elderly and ill” woman unjustly punished by “crooked Colorado politicians.” In a fiery post, he warned of “harsh measures” if state officials failed to comply, though he did not specify what those measures might entail. Sources indicate Trump’s directive was accompanied by calls to the Department of Justice to review Peters’ case, though it remains unclear whether federal authority can override a state-level conviction.

Legal experts are divided on the feasibility of Trump’s order. “The president’s ability to intervene in state convictions is extremely limited,” said constitutional law professor Dr. Emily Hart. “While Trump can issue pardons for federal crimes, Peters’ case falls under Colorado’s jurisdiction, making his directive more symbolic than legally binding.” Others, however, argue that Trump’s rhetoric signals a broader intent to pressure state officials through federal influence, potentially withholding funding or launching investigations into Colorado’s judicial processes.